FCFUNDEDCOMPASS
ComparisonCalculatorsGuidesFAQMethodology
Menu +
ComparisonCalculatorsGuidesFAQMethodology
DE

FIXED EDITORIAL CRITERIA

Comparison Methodology

See the fixed criteria Funded Compass uses to compare prop firm prices, loss rules, payouts, evidence quality and trust signals.

Rules and risk

Loss limits, drawdown type, daily reset, time pressure and trading restrictions receive the greatest weight because they determine practical feasibility.

Cost and payouts

We distinguish one-time and recurring access, known activation, resets and add-ons. Profit split is considered alongside payout eligibility, caps and safety nets.

Trust and evidence

Trustpilot is a time-specific sentiment signal, not proof of future payment. Primary provider documentation and clearly named programs are weighted separately.

Commercial independence

Affiliate availability does not decide inclusion or ranking. Advertising and commission-bearing links are labelled.

Open the German version →

✓

Fixed criteriaNo paid ranking positions

↻

Documented review dateEditorially reviewed 19.08.2026

◎

Primary sourcesProgram and rule pages linked directly

§

Advertising disclosedAffiliate links clearly explained

FREE DEAL ALERT

New deals.
No daily searching.

Receive selected promotions, material rule changes and new research by email. Free, occasional and cancellable at any time.

FCFUNDEDCOMPASS

Independent comparison of named prop-trading evaluation programs. No investment, legal or tax advice.

fundedcompass@web.de ↗
COMPAREAll providersCalculatorsGuidesFAQ
POPULAR REVIEWSFTMOTopstepApexThe5ers
EDITORIALAboutMethodologyResearch libraryCorrections & contact
DISCLOSURESAffiliate disclosureRisk disclosurePrivacyLegal notice
© 2026 Funded Compass · Leipzig, GermanyProp-trading evaluations are high-risk services and are often fully simulated.